mastodonien.de

chaos.social

Zeitpunkt              Nutzer    Delta   Tröts        TNR     Titel                     Version  maxTL
Di 21.05.2024 00:00:02    12.094      +1    6.389.970   528,4 chaos.social              4.2.8      500
Mo 20.05.2024 00:00:00    12.093      +2    6.384.133   527,9 chaos.social              4.2.8      500
So 19.05.2024 00:00:03    12.091      +1    6.378.152   527,5 chaos.social              4.2.8      500
Sa 18.05.2024 00:00:04    12.090      +5    6.372.999   527,1 chaos.social              4.2.8      500
Fr 17.05.2024 00:00:03    12.085      +3    6.367.521   526,9 chaos.social              4.2.8      500
Do 16.05.2024 00:00:03    12.082       0    6.362.594   526,6 chaos.social              4.2.8      500
Mi 15.05.2024 00:00:02    12.082      +2    6.356.782   526,1 chaos.social              4.2.8      500
Di 14.05.2024 00:00:03    12.080      +2    6.350.279   525,7 chaos.social              4.2.8      500
Mo 13.05.2024 00:00:01    12.078       0    6.344.189   525,3 chaos.social              4.2.8      500
So 12.05.2024 00:00:04    12.078       0    6.338.499   524,8 chaos.social              4.2.8      500

Di 21.05.2024 09:24

Is this still a "hot title" or should it better be called a "chilling title"?

journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.11

(Context: in academic writing classes, one common suggestion is combining a creative "hot" title with an explanatory "cold" subtitle.

My favorite example of all time for this strategy is "From Moby Dick to Free Willy" for a paper on institutional change: journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.11 )

HT/via @lorenzoskade

‘Is it worth doing this or is it better or to commit suicide?’: On ethical clearance at a university DOI: 10.1177/00187267241248530 journals.sagepub.com/home/hum Abstract T he article examines the formal process of ‘ethical clearance’ for social science research at a large university and illuminates how it functions to undermine its stated purpose. We find that rather than promoting ethical standards, the bureaucratic process creates negative and cynical attitudes and game playing. For almost all participants, the entire procedure is counterproductive and experienced as absurd, creating a boomerang effect. The findings reveal how a specific rationalization effort leads to widespread experiences of irrationality, where detailed and strict organization merges with experiences of the bizarre. The article develops concepts capturing the experience and resulting organizational type: ‘orbizzarization’ and ‘absurdocracy’. These concepts enrich our understanding of toxic/irrational organizations, including Kafkaesque organizations.

‘Is it worth doing this or is it better or to commit suicide?’: On ethical clearance at a university DOI: 10.1177/00187267241248530 journals.sagepub.com/home/hum Abstract T he article examines the formal process of ‘ethical clearance’ for social science research at a large university and illuminates how it functions to undermine its stated purpose. We find that rather than promoting ethical standards, the bureaucratic process creates negative and cynical attitudes and game playing. For almost all participants, the entire procedure is counterproductive and experienced as absurd, creating a boomerang effect. The findings reveal how a specific rationalization effort leads to widespread experiences of irrationality, where detailed and strict organization merges with experiences of the bizarre. The article develops concepts capturing the experience and resulting organizational type: ‘orbizzarization’ and ‘absurdocracy’. These concepts enrich our understanding of toxic/irrational organizations, including Kafkaesque organizations.

[Öffentlich] Antw.: 0 Wtrl.: 1 Fav.: 1 · via Web

Antw. · Weiterl. · Fav. · Lesez. · Pin · Stumm · Löschen