Zeitpunkt Nutzer Delta Tröts TNR Titel Version maxTL So 16.06.2024 00:04:15 5.516 0 498.288 90,3 FediScience.org 4.2.7 500 Sa 15.06.2024 00:03:59 5.516 +1 497.868 90,3 FediScience.org 4.2.7 500 Fr 14.06.2024 00:03:49 5.515 +3 497.263 90,2 FediScience.org 4.2.7 500 Do 13.06.2024 00:00:42 5.512 0 496.634 90,1 FediScience.org 4.2.7 500 Mi 12.06.2024 00:04:36 5.512 0 496.153 90,0 FediScience.org 4.2.7 500 Di 11.06.2024 00:04:07 5.512 0 495.633 89,9 FediScience.org 4.2.7 500 Mo 10.06.2024 00:00:01 5.512 +1 494.998 89,8 FediScience.org 4.2.7 500 So 09.06.2024 00:04:57 5.511 +1 494.472 89,7 FediScience.org 4.2.7 500 Sa 08.06.2024 00:04:09 5.510 0 493.996 89,7 FediScience.org 4.2.7 500 Fr 07.06.2024 00:00:59 5.510 0 493.352 89,5 FediScience.org 4.2.7 500
Giuseppe Bilotta (@giuseppebilotta) · 05/2022 · Tröts: 673 · Folger: 217
So 16.06.2024 19:10
Whenever I read news about scientific papers being “churned out” at some ridiculous rate by institutions of questionable ethics and accepted into peer reviewed journals I can't but think about my experience that is completely opposite: years to get to a result that is worth publishing, and then years again of back-and-forth with reviewers (some good, some less so) until it finally gets published (if it goes well) and think: am I doing it wrong?
[Öffentlich] Antw.: 0 Wtrl.: 1 Fav.: 0 · via Web