Zeitpunkt Nutzer Delta Tröts TNR Titel Version maxTL Sa 17.05.2025 00:00:12 183.907 +35 10.960.232 59,6 mas.to 4.3.8 500 Fr 16.05.2025 00:00:02 183.872 +25 10.951.988 59,6 mas.to 4.3.8 500 Do 15.05.2025 00:00:03 183.847 +41 10.941.046 59,5 mas.to 4.3.8 500 Mi 14.05.2025 00:00:38 183.806 +12 10.931.630 59,5 mas.to 4.3.8 500 Di 13.05.2025 00:00:15 183.794 -3 10.922.666 59,4 mas.to 4.3.8 500 Mo 12.05.2025 00:07:35 183.797 +22 10.913.354 59,4 mas.to 4.3.8 500 So 11.05.2025 00:02:44 183.775 +24 10.905.971 59,3 mas.to 4.3.8 500 Sa 10.05.2025 00:02:10 183.751 +18 10.898.116 59,3 mas.to 4.3.8 500 Fr 09.05.2025 00:03:44 183.733 +24 10.888.511 59,3 mas.to 4.3.8 500 Do 08.05.2025 00:00:07 183.709 0 10.881.555 59,2 mas.to 4.3.8 500
fritzoids (@fritzoids) · 11/2022 · Tröts: 35.948 · Folger: 531
Sa 17.05.2025 11:07
This article appeared in the May 17, 2025, print edition as 'MIT Won’t Back Up Student’s AI Research'.
tl;dr: economics student writes paper saying AI helped a materials lab find many new materials – a result that suggested that, in certain settings, AI could substantially improve worker productivity; but it might all not be true at all.
https://www.wsj.com/tech/ai/mit-says-it-no-longer-stands-behind-students-ai-research-paper-11434092
screenshot of a paragraph in the article linked in the post. It reads: The paper was championed by MIT economists Daron Acemoglu, who won the 2024 economics Nobel, and David Autor. [begin highlight by me] The two said they were approached in January by a computer scientist with experience in materials science who questioned how the technology worked, and how a lab that he wasn’t aware of had experienced gains in innovation. [end highlight] Unable to resolve those concerns, they brought it to the attention of MIT, which began conducting a review.
[Öffentlich] Antw.: 0 Wtrl.: 0 Fav.: 0 · via Web