Zeitpunkt Nutzer Delta Tröts TNR Titel Version maxTL Sa 18.05.2024 00:00:08 36.960 +6 3.439.844 93,1 Mastodon.ART 4.2.8 500 Fr 17.05.2024 00:00:09 36.954 +5 3.437.189 93,0 Mastodon.ART 4.2.8 500 Do 16.05.2024 00:00:09 36.949 +6 3.434.502 93,0 Mastodon.ART 4.2.8 500 Mi 15.05.2024 00:00:09 36.943 +1 3.432.102 92,9 Mastodon.ART 4.2.8 500 Di 14.05.2024 00:00:09 36.942 +4 3.429.586 92,8 Mastodon.ART 4.2.8 500 Mo 13.05.2024 00:00:11 36.938 +1 3.426.854 92,8 Mastodon.ART 4.2.8 500 So 12.05.2024 00:00:07 36.937 +3 3.424.853 92,7 Mastodon.ART 4.2.8 500 Sa 11.05.2024 00:00:09 36.934 +1 3.422.554 92,7 Mastodon.ART 4.2.8 500 Fr 10.05.2024 00:00:08 36.933 +3 3.420.149 92,6 Mastodon.ART 4.2.8 500 Do 09.05.2024 00:00:10 36.930 0 3.417.295 92,5 Mastodon.ART 4.2.8 500
troy_s :praxis_100: (@troy_s) · 11/2022 · Tröts: 9.848 · Folger: 655
Sa 18.05.2024 22:02
-
Gilchrist, Alan. Seeing Black and White. Oxford University Press, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195187168.001.0001.
So yet again we have a seductive belief that "contrast" and "intensity" is physicalist, which is *an outright fallacy*.
There's no better way to appreciate this slippery idea than an example. In the first case, which "square" is "lighter" or "darker"?
This is from Dr. Tse's work, where the "lightness" of a form is shown to modulate based on the specific cognitive inferences, and *not* the +
[Öffentlich] Antw.: 0 Wtrl.: 0 Fav.: 0 · via Web